Kurt Vonnegut on the Effects of a Writers’ Strike
Via Cat’s Cradle:
Young Castle called me “Scoop.” “Good morning, Scoop. What’s new in the word game?”
“I might ask the same of you,” I replied.
“I’m thinking of calling a general strike of all writers until mankind finally comes to its senses. Would you support it?”
“Do writers have a right to strike? That would be like the police or the firemen walking out.”
“Or the college professors.”
“Or the college professors,” I agreed. I shook my head. “No, I don’t think my conscience would let me support a strike like that. When a man becomes a writer, I think he takes on a sacred obligation to produce beauty and enlightenment and comfort at top speed.”
“I just can’t help thinking what a real shaking up it would give people if, all of a sudden, there were no new books, new plays, new histories, new poems…”
“And how proud would you be when people started dying like fies?” I demanded.
“They’d die more like mad dogs, I think—snarling and snapping at each other and biting their own tails.”
I turned to Castle the elder. “Sir, how does a man die when he’s deprived of the consolations of literature?”
“In one of two ways,” he said, “petrescence of the heart or atrophy of the nervous system.”
“Neither one very pleasant, I expect,” I suggested
“No,” said Castle the elder. “For the love of God, both of you, please keep writing!”
John Dufresne on writing against the clock
John Dufresne, Storyville!
I need to get less anal about it all because I have many stories I want to write, and have decidedly less time to write them in. I’m writing against the clock- we all are.
Time, time, time. In short supply for all of us. And there is less of it now than there was this morning. What you don’t write today will never get written.
Visualizing 10 years of writing
Inspired by github’s activity graph I decided to aggregate all the words I’ve written since I started writing/blogging.
Almost since I started writing 10+ years ago I have been quite consistent with my format.
- I write in individual text files
- One file per session of writing
- Sometimes multiple files per day
- Write in Markdown format
- Label my files
I have written for many reasons:
- Multiple blogs including: professional blog, writing blog.
- Flash fiction
- Short fiction
- Multiple (incomplete) manuscripts
I also have started keeping track of my activity. I use many systems for tracking my work on a daily basis. Specially important when I’ve committed to any everyday project.
- Total word count: 715,580 words
- Filtered word count: 536,000 words (to remove noise from document tiles, comments, quotes, etc)
- Total days logged: 4,470 days
- Total days active: 922 days
- Longest continuos streak: 35 days
- Longest gap in writing: 467 days (it appears I didn’t write a word in 2011)
What does this all mean
Hard to put into words exactly what I felt seeing that graph and reading those numbers.
- I thought I had been more consistent. Honestly, before seeing the graph I would have said I wrote more days than not, and wouldn’t have noticed the big gaps the last two years.
- I thought I had written more. If a novel is roughly 100K words I have written the equivalent of 5 novels. But thing is, not all of that is fiction, I’d say half of it is non-fiction. So I’ve written less than 300K words of fiction rough, unedited and unpublished (for the most part).
- I’ve written for longer than I realize. On the other hand, although I haven’t been writing since I was a kid, I’ve pass the 10 year threshold. Still have a long way to go to write my first million words though.
What does all this work look like?
And here’s the graph in github’s green, because why not.
Pedro Almodovar on the Life of Characters
Pedro Almodóvar’s Oscar Diary:
Walking among the 12 screens full of close-ups of Victoria Abril, Marisa Paredes, Carmen Maura, Penélope Cruz, Antonio Banderas, Caetano Veloso, Pina Bausch, and many more, I feel like a ghost who has been allowed to visit a place where what is alive is what the screens reflect — which is, in some ways, a metaphor for what happens in this city. Everything revolves around the images projected on domestic screens and on those in the cinemas. In the worst sense, people’s lives matter little compared to those of the characters who make up the story of the films and series, unless people are the inspiration for some of those films, as happens with biopics.
Matt Mullenweg on self-care
Sometimes we’re in the boggle, life is throwing everything at us: complicated situations, complicated relationships, we have all these feelings, all these impulses pulling us in different directions, and we have no idea what to do. No idea how to resolve it all. Even no idea what self-care strategy to implement right now. So what’s interesting about the boggle is that there’s the challenge of the situation itself, or situations, and there’s the added challenge of the confusion of it, the scrambling to make sense of everything. So we’re going to try something different, we’re going to stop scrambling and accept, even forgive, the boggle. We’re going to let ourselves be right here, inside any confusion, and take a break from trying to fix any of it. That’s the itinerary, let’s go.
Bob Lefsetz on following the rules
Life is hard, people will take advantage of you and if you’re not looking out for yourself, you’re falling behind.
This always depresses me. In our educational system they teach you to obey, get in line, pay fealty to the teacher, all qualities that will leave you left behind in real life. Especially college. It’s like an alternative universe. You get good grades…exactly why? Have you noticed that all the people who didn’t fit in, who weren’t the teacher’s pet, are the ones who blew up the world and made beaucoup bucks? Turns out you win if you color outside the lines. If you behave you’re a sucker. You’re being taken advantage of right this very second, unaware of it. And to win you’ve got to bend the rules, employ obfuscation and abandon relationships and in many cases morality.
“When I’m in writing mode for a novel, I get up at four a.m. and work for five to six hours. In the afternoon, I run for ten kilometers or swim for fifteen hundred meters (or do both), then I read a bit and listen to some music. I go to bed at nine p.m. I keep to this routine every day without variation. The repetition itself becomes the important thing; it’s a form of mesmerism. I mesmerize myself to reach a deeper state of mind. But to hold to such repetition for so long — six months to a year — requires a good amount of mental and physical strength. In that sense, writing a long novel is like survival training. Physical strength is as necessary as artistic sensitivity.”
Jill Harris, Novel Writing Blueprint:
Even if computers get really, really good at making generic stories, they’ll never have the visceral knowledge of language and human thought.
They cannot know what it is to live within the skin of a living body. They will never have stifled their cries as they were beaten as a child, or laughed at the sight of a huge wave crashing on the beach.
They will never have made love, lost someone they love or driven too fast down a highway late at night with the moon chasing them
William James on Daily Rituals
I love this line from William James:
There is no more miserable human being than one in whom nothing is habitual but indecision
Here is the full context:
The more of the details of our daily life we can hand over to the effortless custody of automatism, the more our higher powers of mind will be set free for their own proper work. There is no more miserable human being than one in whom nothing is habitual but indecision, and for whom the lighting of every cigar, the drinking of every cup, the time of rising and going to bed every day, and the beginning of every bit of work, are subjects of express volitional deliberation.
Hemingway on Daily Writing
When I am working on a book or a story I write every morning as soon after first light as possible. There is no one to disturb you and it is cool or cold and you come to your work and warm as you write. You read what you have written and, as you always stop when you know what is going to happen next, you go on from there. You write until you come to a place where you still have your juice and know what will happen next and you stop and try to live through until the next day when you hit it again. You have started at six in the morning, say, and may go on until noon or be through before that. When you stop you are as empty, and at the same time never empty but filling, as when you have made love to someone you love. Nothing can hurt you, nothing can happen, nothing means anything until the next day when you do it again. It is the wait until the next day that is hard to get through.
Dave Grohl on writing
“The Storyteller” debuted at No. 1 on the hardcover nonfiction list and is now in its second week at the top of the chart. Grohl seemed genuinely tickled to find himself in this new role as an author — and, whether he realizes it or not, he now has solid wisdom to offer fellow ink-stained wretches. His musical mantra, “Never erase, always record,” also applies in the literary realm, where self-editing is a surefire creativity killer.
“There’s an old saying: Don’t bore us, get to the chorus,” Grohl said. “Because with any song, you want to keep the listener engaged. And I would imagine it’s the same when it comes to writing. But that being said, what the [expletive] do I know? I’ve never done this before!”
A Newbie Guide to Building The Planck, a 40% Ortholinear Mechanical Keyboard
I just got a Planck keyboard. The assembly wasn’t too complicated (there are great videos on YouTube), but the research process and the decisions to be made were a bit overwhelming for somebody not familiar with mechanical keyboards. Here is all the info I put together as I was getting into the small keyboard layouts.
I had been considering a new keyboard and looking to try a mechanical keyboard for the first time. I particularly liked the Keychron mechanical keyboard, specially the smaller profiles like the 65% Keychron K7 or K6.
Researching teh 65% keyboards I came across the XD75. The device looked amazing, it had a set of black on white caps with red accent caps, but what got my attention most is that all keys were laid out in a perfect matrix. I had discovered the world of ortholinear mechanical keyboards.
After a bit more digging, I came to the conclusion that my next keyboard was going to be a 40% ortholinear keyboard, the Planck to be more exact. The Planck was created by Jack Humbert who made the matrix layout popular among keyboard enthusiasts.
The Planck is a small beauty that echoes old typewriters, NASA control stations and vintage control panels.
40%? why? just why?
There are two reasons to go with a smaller 40% or 50% keyboard.
- Because you are attracted by weird layouts and are curious about what the experience would be like.
- Because you believe the promise of more ergonomic typing by reducing the number of keys and relying in key combinations instead of moving your hands around.
Honestly, any reason is good enough. For me, that ortholinear layout hits my compulsive sensibility.
Buying the stuff (decisions, decisions)
Honestly the Plank EZ is probably the best choice for most people looking to try a 40% ortholinear keyboard. It comes pre-built and it even comes with RGB backlight per key, something other Plancks lack. However, I really wanted a layout with two 1u space bars, and the EZ doesn’t support it.
If you are ok assembling your own plank, we have to make a few decisions and buy a few parts.
1. The Planck Kit
The nice thing about the OLKB Planck Kit v6 is that is hot-swappable so there’s no soldiering needed, and requires no more experience than knowing how to use a screwdriver.
It does not have RGB, but supports 3 different layouts for the space bar. It uses MX-Style switches (no soldering needed!) The Planck also supports QMK firmware, which allows for all kinds of customizations for keyboards.
Switches come in three top categories: Linear, Tactile and Clicky.
- Linears are smooth and quiet.
- Tactiles are bumpy and quiet.
- and finally Clicky are bumpy and loud.
The default switch in many configurations is the Cherry MX brown (linear), although it seems to be out of favor these days. I went for the Drop Holy Pandas, which are considered a step up.
Keycaps, just like switches, are entirely a matter of preference. The only limitation for our Planck is that it uses Cherry connector style caps (it looks like a
+), which is pretty the gold standard.
A few key aspects to consider when picking up keycaps:
- Material: The most common are ABS and PBT. ABS is the most common and affordable material. It is what Lego is made out of. PBT is a longer lasting material that has a rougher texture compared to the slick feel of ABS.
- Profile: Many profiles to choose from. Above all you would have to pick between sculpted profiles or regular. In my opinion, for an ortholinear keyboard the most important thing to consider is if you want they key profiles to be constant across rows (XDS, DSA, etc`) or not (SA, KAT, Cherry, etc).
- Lettering: If you really want to over think it, you might want to consider if you want sublimated (letter are printed on the cap) or double-shot (where the letters are made out of plastic layer.) Two-shot is considered higher quality.
I ended up going with the MT3 Susuwatari. They keycaps look beautiful, but when I order them I had not learnt yet about all the different profile, and particularly about the MT3.
USB-C adapter: Most of the keyboard cables are USB-C to USB-A. For my 2020 MacBook Air I had to rely on a USB-A to USB-C adapter or a USB-C to USB-C cable.
Keycap and switch remover: Maybe this is obvious if you know what you are doing, but if you are a newbie like me you better not forget to buy one.
Building the keyboard
The whole process of building the keyboard took about an hour. I followed the instructions on the Drop + OLKB Planck Keyboard V6 Build Guide.
Something I struggled with was the bending of the plate. There are two ways to mount the plate. “Strong hold”, that uses brass nut between the board and the plate, or “floating” that does without.
I mounted it “floating” style to keep things simple. The plate bended down, to the point that I could’t fit the switches between the plate and the board. After removing the plate, I realized I had put too much pressure of the bolts. The recommendation is to set 4 switches on the corners but I opted to add a few more in the center to prevent the bending before screwing the plate back again. That did the trick.
It was pretty straightforward even for somebody with zero experience. You can probably put together the keyboard in 15-20 minutes, but it took me an hour. Being my first build I kept double checking my steps.
Connecting the keyboard
As soon as I connected the keyboard it emitted a gameboy-like sound. That could only have be a good sign, right?
The next thing was not a good sign, however. Upon connecting the board macOS (Big Sur) displayed the Keyboard Setup Assistant. It seems the OS could not recognize the board. I tried to follow the directions of the assistant, but I got stuck when it said to press “the key to the left of the right Shift.” The default layout of the plank has only one
Shift key on the right side, so no way of completing that step.
I disregarded the assistant and went instead to test the board online at KeyboardTester.com.
All keys appeared to work as expected, except for 2. Those were the keys assigned to Layers (
Lower), so I figured that the site simply couldn’t register those.
And that’s it. Success!
First of all I am painfully slow. Slower than slow.
- I like these switches but i might need silent ones if I am going to type with other people in the room and I want to go stealth.
I love the deep scoop of the Susuwatari caps but it appears that this keyset is meant for an inclined board.
I feel the edge of the lower row keys digging deep into my thumbnail. It hursts after 20 minutes or typing. I need to figure out a more ergonomic setup for the keys.
I tried raising the board with a small bumper on the back (1/2 inches). It works but not a long term solution.
I also tried flipping the space bar keys and it feels much better. I’m actually looking to try the new ice caps that are on order. one single flat profile for all keys sounds nice.
Accuracy is much lower on this ortholinear layout. For instance I keep expecting
N to fall mostly right under
J but it is actually farther than in staggered. Also in staggered
N is closer to
M, but in this new ortho layout
M is directly under
I want to move a few keys around.
Space for one feels really. far from where my thumb rests. It seems more natural to swap space keys with
I miss having a right
Return is placed where I would expect
Shift to be, so I keep adding new lines unintentionally when I’m trying to capitalize. I a better plan for caps (adding a right shift, more centered single shift, tap dance, auto-shift, etc).
I miss having
Return on my home row.
For some reason it took me forever to find the question mark
?, and I had to consult the manual to find the dash
-. I need to rethink all non alpha keys. I need a plan for the missing keys (numbers, special characters, etc).
I also found the arrows in a strange position. The horizontal layout is something I need to get used to. are used in vim. I’ve seen other Planck layouts for the arrows, although I might need to give this a chance.
I am excited about the promise of comfortable writing, and the idea of being more in control of my typing with less hand movements and without looking down at the keyboard.
Lastly, all this learning a new layout is making me think that this might be the time to try Colemak.
I’m excited to get to know this new Planck.
On Internet Checkpoints
Without any of the traditional publicity mechanisms, everything depends on “foot traffic”. You could post an unsearchable, unsortable checkpoint on a custom website… and no one would ever read it. Attaching it to a YouTube video — even an obscure one — feels, perhaps, like writing a message on a wall in a crowded city. You are basically assured that, eventually, someone will pass by and read it; you are likewise assured that you won’t know who they are, nor they you.
On self-aware AI
Scott Alexander, Highlights From The Comments On Acemoglu And AI:
Non-self-aware computers can beat humans at Chess, Go, and Starcraft. They can write decent essays and paint good art. Whatever you’re expecting you “need self-awareness” in order to do, I bet non-self-aware computers can do it too. Computers are just going to get better and better at stuff, and at some point probably they’ll be as good as humans at various things, and if you ask them if they’re self-aware they’ll give some answer consistent with their programming, which for all I know is what we do too.
Bourdain Documentary’s Use of A.I. to Mimic Voice Draws Questions:
But on the film’s opening weekend, 45 seconds of it is drawing much of the public’s attention.
The focus is on a few sentences of what an unknowing audience member would believe to be recorded audio of Bourdain, who died by suicide in 2018. In reality, the voice is generated by artificial intelligence: Bourdain’s own words, turned into speech by a software company who had been given several hours of audio that could teach a machine how to mimic his tone, cadence and inflection
To some, part of the discomfort about the use of artificial intelligence is the fear that deepfake videos may become increasingly pervasive. Right now, viewers tend to automatically believe in the veracity of audio and video, but if audiences begin to have good reason to question that, it could give people plausible deniability to disavow authentic footage, said Hilke Schellmann, a filmmaker and assistant professor of journalism at New York University who is writing a book on A.I.
On active learning
Experiential Learning Creates Skill — The Power of Active Practice:
Aim to practice, apply what you learn or do something with that knowledge.
Learning something new does not necessarily transform or improve you if you don’t get past the knowledge acquisition phase. You lose what you don’t use, apply or practice. But you gain a lot by doing something with it.
Better learners are active learners. They practice what they learn. The application of knowledge creates skill. When you make learning an experience, you acquire skills for life.